The Bombay High Court has stopped the release of the movie 'Tu Hai Meri Kiran' until co-producer Echelon Productions deposits ₹8.85 crore with interest, ruling that an Instagram collaboration cannot cancel written contractual obligations.
Rajasthan High Court: Passport Authority Not Bound by Adverse Police Verification Report, Says Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand. Savitri Sharma vs Union of India Rajasthan High Court Rules Adverse Police Report Cannot Lead to Automatic Passport Denial The Rajasthan High Court has determined
The Court was hearing a plea challenging an LOC issued against a man concerning a matrimonial dispute case. Abhayjeet Singh vs State of Rajasthan Rajasthan High Court lays down guidelines for issuance of LOCs The Rajasthan High Court has noted that investigative
Chaitanya Rohilla vs Union of India: Committeeto examine Deepfake issue The Delhi High Court has asked the central government to develop a committee to handle deepfake technology as part of its recent directives. The initiative stems from petitions by journalist Rajat Sharma
India's burgeoning judiciary cannot keep up with that country's burgeoning needs. Reiterating his dire warning about the gap between the judiciary and the other arms of government, the Supreme Court said the shortage was currently at less than 25 judges per million
TheAllahabad High Court Directive for a CBI Probe into DRT Conduct has directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate allegations of misconduct against a former Presiding Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in Lucknow, highlighting concerns about judicial accountability
The Allahabad High Court, in Upendra @ Balweer v. State of Uttar Pradesh, criticized the lack of legal provisions for compensating wrongfully prosecuted individuals, especially in cases where trial courts convict innocents under pressure to preserve reputations. Highlighting a man’s 13-year imprisonment
The Supreme Court held the notification issued on 2 August 2019 abolishing the Odisha Administrative Tribunal (OAT) constitutional. It was held that abolishing OAT by the union government under 323A and Section 21 of the General Clauses Act is valid and not
The 1992 Supreme Court case Punjab National Bank v. Surendra Prasad Sinha (AIR 1992 SC 1815) serves as a seminal judgment in the context of Indian banking law and the interpretation of the Limitation Act. This case centers on a dispute involving
100 Important Judgements of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in2023 1- M/s Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd. v Union of India 2023SC ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 2- Dr.Balram Singh vs Union of India 2023SC 3) TATA Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Siva Industries and Holdings
The Supreme Court of India's judgment in Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji (1987) is a pivotal case in Indian legal jurisprudence, particularly concerning the interpretation of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. This case underscores the judiciary's approach towards condoning