The Calcutta High Court recently ruled that a deceased government employee's family pension must be split equally between his two wives, while his gratuity belongs solely to his registered nominee.
Iftikhar Ahmed v. Syed Meharban Ali: A Landmark in the Doctrine of Res Judicata | BareLaw Iftikhar Ahmed v. Syed Meharban Ali: A Landmark in the Doctrine of Res Judicata | BareLaw The judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Iftikhar
The case of “Indian Bank v. Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd, AIR 1998 SC 1952″ is a landmark judgment in Indian civil procedural law. This case primarily dealt with the applicability of Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Navigating Legal Review: Insights from Haridas Das v. Smt. Usha Rani Banik, 2006 (3) SCALE 287 | BareLaw Introduction In the Indian legal system, judiciary review parameters and correction of errors in appellate courts are the most important components for justice delivery.
In the matter of Koppi Setty v. Ratnam v. Pamarti Venka, 2009 RLR 27 (NSC), the appellant filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court challenging the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Company Formation in India | BareLaw Overview: Corporate business management plays a major role in firms. Such limited liability partnerships meet the needs of partners who desire to reduce or limit their liabilities. Therefore, how do these companies form or incorporate LLPs
EMERGING GIG ECONOMY IN SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO INDIA | BareLaw It is now apparent that the industrial and corporate sectors globally have been impacted by these technologies. In this respect, the tech sector’s industries including those in the corporate are well known
Procedure in relation to Children in conflict with law under chapter IV of Juvenile Justice act: BareLaw To begin with, who is a child in conflict with the law? prior to outlining the procedure related to children in conflict with the law,
The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Vriend v. Alberta, 1998, marked a turning point in Canadian human rights law, especially concerning discrimination based on sexual orientation. This case highlighted the significance of legislative inclusion of sexual orientation as a protected ground
The Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001, represented a pivotal moment in the recognition of labor rights and freedom of association in Canada, underscoring the state's positive obligation to protect vulnerable worker groups
Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys: Upholding Religious Freedom in Canadian Schools
The Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006, was a groundbreaking decision upholding religious freedom in schools, emphasizing the balance between individual rights and public safety.