The Calcutta High Court recently ruled that a deceased government employee's family pension must be split equally between his two wives, while his gratuity belongs solely to his registered nominee.
The case of ONGC Ltd. v. State Bank of India, AIR 2000 SC 2548 | BareLaw The case of ONGC Ltd. v. State Bank of India, AIR 2000 SC 2548, is an important decision in the Indian legal landscape, particularly in the
Rajni Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Malhotra: A Detailed Analysis of Order 37, Rule 4, and Procedural Nuances in Civil Litigation | BareLaw Rajni Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Malhotra: A Detailed Analysis of Order 37, Rule 4, and Procedural Nuances in Civil Litigation
Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra: A Landmark Judgment on Order VII Rule 11 of CPC | BareLaw Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra: A Landmark Judgment on Order VII Rule 11 of CPC Introduction: The Supreme Court of India gave a
Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal: A Landmark Case in Election Law and Procedural Fairness | BareLaw Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal: A Landmark Case in Election Law and Procedural Fairness Article: The Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal case of the Indian Supreme
Santosh Kumar v. Bhai Mool Singh: A Supreme Court Ruling on Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suits | BareLaw Santosh Kumar v. Bhai Mool Singh: A Supreme Court Ruling on Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suits Article: The case of
State of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain, AIR 1977 SC 1680 | BareLaw This lead case, State of U.P. v Nawab Hussain, AIR 1977 SC 1680 is a landmark decision in Indian legal history with particular relevance to the concept of res judicata
A Study of Mahant Ram Dass v. Mahant Ganga Dass, AIR 1961 S.C. 882 | BareLaw A Study of Mahant Ram Dass v. Mahant Ganga Dass, AIR 1961 S.C. 882″ The case of Mahant Ram Dass v. Mahant Ganga Dass, AIR 1961
The case of C.A. Balakrishnan v. Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, AIR 2003 Mad. 170, is an important decision that addresses the applicability of Order II, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) to writ petitions filed under Article 226 of
In the case of Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari, 1986 RLR 370, the central issue revolved around the eviction notice served to M/S Gill & Co. on various grounds, including non-payment of rent, misuse, bona fide requirement as a residence for
Unraveling the Legal Maze: Gundaji Satwaji Shinde v. Ram Chandra Bhikaji Joshi, AIR 1979 SC 653″ | BareLaw Unraveling the Legal Maze: Gundaji Satwaji Shinde v. Ram Chandra Bhikaji Joshi, AIR 1979 SC 653″ | BareLaw Introduction The judgment of Gundaji Satwaji