The Calcutta High Court recently ruled that a deceased government employee's family pension must be split equally between his two wives, while his gratuity belongs solely to his registered nominee.
The case is titled “State of Punjab v. Gurdev Singh (1991) 4 SCC 1” and it revolves around the applicability of Article 113 Limitation Act, 1963 in respect to termination of employment and its subsequent actions. Background and Facts Legal Issues and
State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO (2005) 3 SCC 752 | BareLaw The “State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO (2005) 3 SCC 752” case stands as a cornerstone in the Indian judicial system, particularly concerning the application of Section 5 of the
The case of Mayor of Bradford Corporation v. Pickles, adjudicated in the late 19th century | BareLaw
Introduction The case of Mayor of Bradford Corporation v. Pickles, adjudicated in the late 19th century, stands as a landmark judgment in English law, particularly in the areas of property rights and water rights. This case is a crucial reference in understanding
The case of Ram Ghulam and Anr. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh, adjudicated in 1949 | BareLaw Introduction The case of Ram Ghulam and Anr. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh, adjudicated in 1949, stands as a pivotal moment in the
The judgment of The Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. v. M/s. Madan Lal Das & Sons, Bareilly, AIR 1977 SC 523 | BareLaw The judgment of the Hon’ble Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. v. M/s Madan Lal Das & Sons, Bareilly, AIR
The 2004 Supreme Court case Union of India v. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. (AIR 2004 SC 1596) | BareLaw Introduction The Supreme Court case Union of India v. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. (AIR 2004 SC 1596) of 2004 is an
The case of M/s Mechalec Engineers and Manufacturers v. Basic Equipment Corporation, AIR 1977 SC 577 | BareLaw The case of M/s Mechalec Engineers and Manufacturers v. Basic Equipment Corporation, AIR 1977 SC 577, is a significant judgment in Indian legal history,
The case of Dalpat Kaur v. Prahlad Singh, AIR 1993 SC 276 | BareLaw Dalpat Kaur v. Prahlad Singh, AIR 1993 SC 276 is very important in the case law regarding grant of temporary injunctions and conditions to be imposed. This case
The case of Monohar Lal v. Seth Hira Lal, AIR 1962 SC 527 | BareLaw Monohar Lal v. Seth Hira Lal, AIR 1962 SC 527 is a landmark judgment in the Indian legal system regarding the interpretation of CPC. This case revolves
Bhanu Kumar Jain v. Archana Kumar: An Exploration of Procedural Law in Civil Litigation | BareLaw Article: The case was taken from a partition suit that Sh. N.N. Mukherjee had filed against his family members including Archana Kumar. The respondents neither appeared