The Bombay High Court has stopped the release of the movie 'Tu Hai Meri Kiran' until co-producer Echelon Productions deposits ₹8.85 crore with interest, ruling that an Instagram collaboration cannot cancel written contractual obligations.
The case "Ajaib Singh v. Sirhind Cooperative Marketing-cum-Processing Service Society Ltd., AIR 1996 SC 1351" is a critical judgment in Indian labor law, particularly addressing the application of the Limitation Act, 1963, in the context of industrial disputes.
The case "Mahabir Kishore v. State of M.P., AIR 1990 SC 313" is a pivotal judgment in Indian legal history, particularly regarding the application of Section 17(1)(c) of the Limitation Act, 1963. This section addresses the commencement of the limitation period in
Kartar Singh v. Harbans Kaur [(1994) 4 SCC 730 | BareLaw Background This paper examines a case by the Supreme Court of India in Kartar Singh v. Harbans Kaur where it touches on important points of law on property, particularly as to
Muhammad Raza v. Abbas Bandi Bibi (1932) | BareLaw Muhammad Raza v. Abbas Bandi Bibi (1932)is an important case in the law of property, especially concerning legal restrictions on transferability of property. It stands out for its discussion on conditions attached to
Jumma Masjid, Mercara v. Kodimaniandra Deviah (AIR 1962 SC 847) | BareLaw Background A landmark judgement by the Supreme Court of India in Jumma Masjid, Mercara v. Kodimaniandra Deviah (AIR 1962 SC 847) decided upon the intricate aspects of Transfer of Property
Ganga Dhar v. Shankar Lal, AIR 1958 SC 770 The Supreme Court of India in Ganga Dhar v. Shankar Lal (AIR 1958 SC 770) gave a landmark judgment on equity of redemption as stated in the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Background
Doctrine of Lis Pendens in Indian Property Law: Analyzing G.T Girish v. Y. Subba Raju | BareLaw The Supreme Court’s decision in G.T Girish v. Y.Subba Raju (AIR 2022 SC 61), gives a critical analysis and explanation of the doctrine of lis
Pomal Kanji Govindji v. Vrajlal Karsandas Purohit (AIR 1989 SC 436 : (1989) 1 SCC 458) | BareLaw The Supreme Court’s judgment in Pomal Kanji Govindji v. Vrajlal Karsandas Purohit (AIR 1989 SC 436 : (1989) 1 SCC 458) sheds light on
Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors. v. Manjit Kaur & Ors, Civil Appeal No.7764/2014 | BareLaw The case “Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors. v. Manjit Kaur & Ors, Civil Appeal No.7764/2014” is a significant one as it clarifies on the application of the
Rajender Singh v. Santa Singh, AIR 1973 SC 2537 | BareLaw The case of “Rajender Singh v. Santa Singh, AIR 1973 SC 2537“it discusses property possession, inheritance rights and application of Limitation Act. Background and Property Dispute In the year 1935, Smt.