The Bombay High Court has stopped the release of the movie 'Tu Hai Meri Kiran' until co-producer Echelon Productions deposits ₹8.85 crore with interest, ruling that an Instagram collaboration cannot cancel written contractual obligations.
R.B. Policies At Lloyd’s v. Butler, adjudicated in 1949 | BareLaw Introduction This decision in property rights and the Limitation Act of 1939 is important. The argument is about a stolen car which ended up at Mr. Alfred Butler who was an
Rajesh Kanta Roy v. Shanti Debi (AIR 1957 SC 255 : 1957 SCR 77 | BareLaw Shanti Debi, the respondent in the case of Rajesh Kanta Roy v. Shanti Debi (AIR 1957 SC 255: 1957 SCR 77) is a significant legal issue
Ram Baran Prasad v. Ram Mohit Hazra, AIR 1967 SC 744 | BareLaw Ram Baran Prasad v. Ram Mohit Hazra, AIR 1967 SC 744 is a case that is pivotal in the Indian Supreme Court on the doctrine of perpetuity in relation
R Kempraj v Burton Son & Co, AIR 1970 SC 1872 | BareLaw Supreme Court of India has decided on the critical question whether options for renewal of lease are within the definition of the rule against perpetuity as given in Transfer
The Rosher v. Rosher case, decided in 1884, is a landmark judgment in property law | BareLaw In property law, the Rosher V. Rosher case was a landmark decision under Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. J.B. Rosher’s will
The case of Ram Newaz v. Nankoo, AIR 1926 All 283 | BareLaw This 1926 case of Ram Newaz v. Nankoo, AIR 1926 All 283 engages with the intricacies of property rights and legal interpretation in India. The matter was about a
The Supreme Court of India’s judgment in Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd v. Maharaja Sir Brijnath Singhji Deo, AIR 1975 SC 1810 | BareLaw India’s Supreme Court ruling in the case of Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd v. Maharaja Sir Brijnath Singhji
Tulk v. Moxhay (1848) 2 Ch. 774 | BareLaw Tulk v. Moxhay (1848) 2 Ch. An important decision in English property law, 774, established that equitable covenants might be enforced against prospective buyers. This article highlights the significance of the case and
Zoroastrian Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. District Registrar, Co-op. Societies (Urban) (2005) 5 SCC 632 | BareLaw The Zoroastrian Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. District Registrar, Co-op. Societies (Urban) (2005) 5 SCC 632 case is a matter of enquiry into whether a
One of the most notable decisions in Indian legal history is “Sampuran Singh v. Niranjan Kaur (Smt.), AIR 1999 SC 1047,” which specifically deals with the Limitation Act, 1963 in the context of redemption of mortgage deeds. This case provides important insights