The legal debates surrounding Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) asking for the status of a minority have been a regular subject of judicial scrutiny in India. Established in the late 19th century and designated as a minority institution, AMU’s implications for educational rights
In the matter of Koppi Setty v. Ratnam v. Pamarti Venka, 2009 RLR 27 (NSC), the appellant filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court challenging the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Company Formation in India | BareLaw Overview: Corporate business management plays a major role in firms. Such limited liability partnerships meet the needs of partners who desire to reduce or limit their liabilities. Therefore, how do these companies form or incorporate LLPs
EMERGING GIG ECONOMY IN SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO INDIA | BareLaw It is now apparent that the industrial and corporate sectors globally have been impacted by these technologies. In this respect, the tech sector’s industries including those in the corporate are well known
Procedure in relation to Children in conflict with law under chapter IV of Juvenile Justice act: BareLaw To begin with, who is a child in conflict with the law? prior to outlining the procedure related to children in conflict with the law,
The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Vriend v. Alberta, 1998, marked a turning point in Canadian human rights law, especially concerning discrimination based on sexual orientation. This case highlighted the significance of legislative inclusion of sexual orientation as a protected ground
The Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001, represented a pivotal moment in the recognition of labor rights and freedom of association in Canada, underscoring the state's positive obligation to protect vulnerable worker groups
The Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006, was a groundbreaking decision upholding religious freedom in schools, emphasizing the balance between individual rights and public safety.
The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in United States v. Burns established that extraditing individuals to countries where they could face the death penalty violates section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This ruling underscores the importance of aligning
The R. v. Marshall case was a pivotal moment in Canadian jurisprudence, highlighting the need to honor historic Indigenous-Crown treaties. It addressed the complexities of Indigenous treaty rights, particularly in the context of fishing, and sparked significant controversy and debate.
The R. v. Stinchcombe case, a pivotal Supreme Court of Canada decision, established the necessity of full and complete disclosure of evidence by the Crown in criminal cases. This decision, rooted in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, has significantly influenced