The Calcutta High Court recently ruled that a deceased government employee's family pension must be split equally between his two wives, while his gratuity belongs solely to his registered nominee.
Doctrine of Lis Pendens in Indian Property Law: Analyzing G.T Girish v. Y. Subba Raju | BareLaw The Supreme Court’s decision in G.T Girish v. Y.Subba Raju (AIR 2022 SC 61), gives a critical analysis and explanation of the doctrine of lis
Pomal Kanji Govindji v. Vrajlal Karsandas Purohit (AIR 1989 SC 436 : (1989) 1 SCC 458) | BareLaw The Supreme Court’s judgment in Pomal Kanji Govindji v. Vrajlal Karsandas Purohit (AIR 1989 SC 436 : (1989) 1 SCC 458) sheds light on
Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors. v. Manjit Kaur & Ors, Civil Appeal No.7764/2014 | BareLaw The case “Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors. v. Manjit Kaur & Ors, Civil Appeal No.7764/2014” is a significant one as it clarifies on the application of the
Rajender Singh v. Santa Singh, AIR 1973 SC 2537 | BareLaw The case of “Rajender Singh v. Santa Singh, AIR 1973 SC 2537“it discusses property possession, inheritance rights and application of Limitation Act. Background and Property Dispute In the year 1935, Smt.
R.B. Policies At Lloyd’s v. Butler, adjudicated in 1949 | BareLaw Introduction This decision in property rights and the Limitation Act of 1939 is important. The argument is about a stolen car which ended up at Mr. Alfred Butler who was an
Rajesh Kanta Roy v. Shanti Debi (AIR 1957 SC 255 : 1957 SCR 77 | BareLaw Shanti Debi, the respondent in the case of Rajesh Kanta Roy v. Shanti Debi (AIR 1957 SC 255: 1957 SCR 77) is a significant legal issue
Ram Baran Prasad v. Ram Mohit Hazra, AIR 1967 SC 744 | BareLaw Ram Baran Prasad v. Ram Mohit Hazra, AIR 1967 SC 744 is a case that is pivotal in the Indian Supreme Court on the doctrine of perpetuity in relation
R Kempraj v Burton Son & Co, AIR 1970 SC 1872 | BareLaw Supreme Court of India has decided on the critical question whether options for renewal of lease are within the definition of the rule against perpetuity as given in Transfer
The Rosher v. Rosher case, decided in 1884, is a landmark judgment in property law | BareLaw In property law, the Rosher V. Rosher case was a landmark decision under Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. J.B. Rosher’s will
The case of Ram Newaz v. Nankoo, AIR 1926 All 283 | BareLaw This 1926 case of Ram Newaz v. Nankoo, AIR 1926 All 283 engages with the intricacies of property rights and legal interpretation in India. The matter was about a