The 1992 Supreme Court case Punjab National Bank v. Surendra Prasad Sinha (AIR 1992 SC 1815) serves as a seminal judgment in the context of Indian banking law and the interpretation of the Limitation Act. This case centers on a dispute involving
Tulk v. Moxhay (1848) 2 Ch. 774 | BareLaw Tulk v. Moxhay (1848) 2 Ch. An important decision in English property law, 774, established that equitable covenants might be enforced against prospective buyers. This article highlights the significance of the case and
Zoroastrian Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. District Registrar, Co-op. Societies (Urban) (2005) 5 SCC 632 | BareLaw The Zoroastrian Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. District Registrar, Co-op. Societies (Urban) (2005) 5 SCC 632 case is a matter of enquiry into whether a
One of the most notable decisions in Indian legal history is “Sampuran Singh v. Niranjan Kaur (Smt.), AIR 1999 SC 1047,” which specifically deals with the Limitation Act, 1963 in the context of redemption of mortgage deeds. This case provides important insights
The case of Kenneth Solomon v. Dan Singh Bawa, adjudicated by the Delhi High Court in 1985 | BareLaw
Background The Kenneth Solomon v. Dan Singh Bawa case 1985, heard by the Delhi High Court, is a landmark judgement in Indian property law. It deals with inheritance tenancy rights and wills implications under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Facts of
Background Case Overview In the case of Mohar Singh v. Devi Charan (AIR 1988 SC 1365), which is a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court of India had to deal with complicated property law issues arising from tenancy agreement on co-ownership. Tenancy and
Background The case of N. Ramaiah v. Nagaraj S, adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court in 2001, delves into complex issues of property rights and succession under the Indian legal framework. Case Details Appellant’s Background: N. Ramaiah, the appellant, filed an appeal
Article: As far as understanding of property law and contractual obligations are concerned, the Supreme Court of India in Ram Niwas v. Bano, AIR 2000 SC 2921 has provided a landmark decision on this point. This case considers both the Transfer of
The case of Duncans Industries Ltd. v. State of U.P., (2000) 1 SCC 633, focusing on its facts, legal contentions, issues, and judgment. Facts: Legal Proceedings: Contentions: Legal Issues: Judgment and Observation: The Supreme Court held that: This case is important in
Bamadev Panigrahi v. Monorama Raj, AIR 1974 AP 226 is an important judgment on Indian property law which deals with classification of a property as movable or immovable and its effect in legal proceedings. Background and Facts: To operate a mobile cinema
Introduction Grant v. Australian Knitting Mills (1936) is a famous legal case in commonwealth tort law of carelessness as applied to the production and marketing of consumer goods. It highlights that manufacturers owe consumers certain obligations and forms the basis for some
