The legal debates surrounding Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) asking for the status of a minority have been a regular subject of judicial scrutiny in India. Established in the late 19th century and designated as a minority institution, AMU’s implications for educational rights
Jurisdiction: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction: Bombay High CourtCase Filed (in years): 1876Case Decided (in years): 1877Judges: Justice Melvill, Justice Kemball, N HaridasCase Brief Prepared by: M Balaji Case Brief: Reg v. Govinda (1877) ILR Bom 342 Introduction: One of the most important concepts
CASE NAME- K. M. NANAVATI V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRACITATIONS- [CITATION: 1962 AIR 605]COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIABENCH: SUBBARAO, K.DAS, S.K. DAYAL, RAGHUBARAPPELLANT: K.M. NANAVATIRESPONDENT: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA CASE SUMMARY STATEMENT OF FACTS Kevas Manekshaw Nanavati was an Indian Naval Officer who shifted
Case Name- I.R. Coelho v State of Tamil NaduCitations- [(2007) 2 SCC 1: AIR 2007 SC 861.] FACTS OF THE CASE After the Constitution was instituted, a few agrarian and land reforms legislation were passed. These were tested in State High Courts
Justice K.S.Puttaswamy (Retired). V. Union of India and Ors, 2017. Citation: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012, (2017) 10 SCC 1 Court: Supreme Court of India Parties Involved: Appellant: Justice K S Puttaswamy (Retired)Respondent: Union of India and Others. Bench: Sanjay
PRIMARY DETAILS OF THE CASE: Case No Jurisdiction Case Filed (in years) Case Decided on Judges : : : : : Criminal Appeal No. 90 of 1957. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Supreme Court of India 1957 March 11, 1958 Justice Bose Introduction: It
CITATION- (1410) Y.B. 11 hen. IV of 47. Introduction The case revolves around the principle of injuria sine damnum and damnum sine injuria. Both the concepts state different theories and reasoning. The case is necessary for the law of torts as it
Case Name- Town Area Committee and Ors. vs Prabhu Dayal and Anr.Citations- AIR 1975 All 132 Introduction- the case mainly revolves around the U.P. Municipal Act and the maxim “damnum sine injuria”. The case is in relation to the construction and demolition
CASE NAME- ASHBY V. WHITECITATIONS – (1703) 92 ER 126 Introduction The case states the importance of fundamental rights vested by UK Constitutional Law. The issue in the case is related to civil law and the rights that a person holds to
Case Name- Sakshi vs Union of IndiaCitations– AIR 2004 SC 3566, 2004 (2) ALD Cri 504 BackgroundSakshi, was an NGO that tried to focus on violence against women filed a petition in the apex court to declare that rape according to Section