Imagine walking into an office to submit your CV and walking out by driving off in one of the most expensive hypercars in the world. That is not a scene from a Hollywood heist movie. It actually happened when a man walked into Bugatti’s premises looking for employment, spotted a multimillion-dollar Bugatti Chiron with its keys sitting inside, and decided to hit the road toward Germany.
What followed was even wilder. Bugatti CEO Mate Rimac grabbed the keys to a Porsche 911 and personally followed the stolen hypercar. The chase spanned international borders before Croatian and Austrian police stepped in to stop the vehicle. While the incident sounds like something straight out of an action thriller, it opens up serious questions about vehicle theft, whether leaving your keys inside excuses a crime, and whether ordinary citizens can legally chase down their stolen property.
The Hypercar Heist: What Actually Happened?
According to reports, the man visited the company in Croatia seeking work. Finding the keys left inside the Chiron, he drove off. When Rimac realised what had happened, he pursued the vehicle in his Porsche 911. The CEO initially thought the recovery would be simple: find the car on the roadside, pick it up, and perhaps even drive the man back home.
Reality proved much more complicated. Because of the astronomical value of the Chiron, police in Croatia and Austria mounted a massive operation involving dozens of officers and patrol cars. Even though Rimac carried valid identity papers and vehicle registration documents, authorities did not let him just drive the car away. Instead, they impounded the hypercar onto a flatbed truck and brought Rimac to a police station to verify ownership and complete formalities.
At the station, the man reportedly told Rimac that leaving the keys in the vehicle made it tempting. Rimac decided not to press personal charges and expressed relief that nobody was injured. However, the police made it clear that criminal prosecution would proceed regardless of whether the owner forgave him.
Does Leaving The Keys Inside Make It Any Less Of A Theft?
A common misconception among everyday citizens is that if an owner leaves their belongings unattended or unlocked, taking them is somehow a lesser offence or a harmless act of opportunity. Legally, that argument falls flat.
Under criminal law, theft does not depend on whether the owner was careless. In India, theft is governed by Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), which replaces the old Section 378 and Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The law defines theft as taking any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, with dishonest intention.
The critical element is dishonest intention (known in law as mens rea). The moment a person drives away in a vehicle that does not belong to them, without the owner’s permission, the crime of theft is complete. Leaving the keys in the ignition or on the dashboard does not create implied consent to take the vehicle. In court, claiming that “the keys were right there” offers zero legal defence against a charge of theft.
Can An Owner Just Chase And Grab Stolen Property Back?
When someone steals your car or phone, your immediate instinct might be to give chase. But what are the legal boundaries of self-help and private recovery?
Under Indian procedural law, an ordinary citizen does have limited authority to intervene. Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which mirrors the old Section 43 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), deals with arrest by a private person. Under this provision:
- Any private individual may arrest or cause to be arrested any person who in their presence commits a non-bailable and cognizable offence.
- The citizen must hand over the arrested person to a police officer or the nearest police station without unnecessary delay.
- A citizen does not have the legal right to inflict physical violence, conduct high-speed dangerous manoeuvres, or take the law entirely into their own hands.
High-speed car chases on public roads can quickly lead to criminal charges against the pursuer. If a vehicle owner drives recklessly while chasing a thief, they can face prosecution for rash and negligent driving under Section 281 of the BNS (old Section 279 IPC). If someone is injured or killed in the process, the pursuer faces severe penalties regardless of their status as the victim of theft.
Why Police Must Seize Stolen Property Even If The Owner Is Present
Many people wonder why the Austrian police did not simply hand the Bugatti keys back to Rimac on the side of the road. Why load a car onto a truck and take the actual owner to a police station?
When police recover stolen goods, those goods become case property (evidence). In India, under Sections 497 and 503 of the BNSS (replacing Sections 451 and 457 of the CrPC), recovered stolen property must be formally documented, inventoried, and produced before a magistrate or retained under proper panchnama (police documentation).
Police cannot simply rely on roadside declarations of ownership. They must verify title documents, check vehicle identification numbers (VIN), record the condition of the car, and ensure the chain of custody remains intact for trial. To get their vehicle back, owners usually must apply for interim custody (known as superdari in Indian courts) by submitting proof of ownership and executing an indemnity bond.
Can A Victim Simply Choose Not To Press Charges?
Rimac stated that he did not intend to press charges against the jobseeker. However, European authorities noted that criminal prosecution would still go forward. This rule applies similarly in Indian jurisprudence.
Crimes are fundamentally offences against the state, not merely private disputes between two individuals. While theft of lower-value goods may be compounded (settled) under Section 359 of the BNSS (old Section 320 CrPC) with the permission of the court and the consent of the owner, the state retains the authority to prosecute cognizable offences.
A complainant can state that they hold no personal grudge, but they cannot simply snap their fingers and cancel a state investigation once an FIR is lodged and police machinery is activated. This ensures that serious offences are not privately swept under the rug through intimidation, payoffs, or private settlements outside the justice system.
Why This Matters For Everyday Citizens
While few people will ever chase a multimillion-dollar hypercar down an international highway, vehicle theft happens every single day across Indian cities. This viral episode offers crucial practical takeaways:
- Never leave keys in your vehicle: Beyond inviting criminal opportunists, insurers often reject car theft claims on grounds of owner negligence if keys are left unattended inside the vehicle.
- Alert police instead of playing movie hero: Private pursuit carries massive legal and physical risks. The safest and legally sound path is providing real-time GPS tracking details directly to law enforcement.
- Expect paperwork: Recovering stolen property requires following established legal procedure through police stations and courts, even when you have undisputed proof of ownership.
The Bugatti CEO may have lived through an unforgettable car chase, but the law remains clear: taking someone else’s car is a serious crime, and recovering it belongs in the hands of the justice system.
Story reported by Top Trending News, Viral Videos, Latest Viral News, Odd News, Memes and Puzzles, Social Media Viral News | Hindustan Times. This article is BareLaw’s independent explanation and analysis.
📲 Get every BareLaw story on Telegram — simple legal news, 5 times a day, free: t.me/barelaw
