Memorandum of Writ Appeal (Under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent Act
Table of Contents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF………….
AT……………
W.A. No. ……….. of ……..
Against
W.P. No………… of ……..
Between
1……………….. …Appellants/Petitioners
And
2………………. ….Respondents
The address for service of all notices, summons and processes on the above named Appellants are that of their Counself M/s………………………….Advocates, ………………..R/o………………………
The above named Petitioners/Appellants beg to present this Memorandum of Writ Appeal aggrieved against the Order made in W.P. No. ……………. Of…………… dated ……. By His Lordship Justice Shri……………………… for the following among other –
GROUNDS
1. The Judgment of the learned single Judge is not sustainable eithe in law or on facts.
2. The learned single Judge ought to have appreciated that the Appellants/Petitioners who are the owners of the property and who are in actual possession and enjoyment of the property are entitled to maintain the writ petition questioning the taking over of direct management by the respondents by virtue of a panchanama.
3. The learned single Judge should have appreciated tha the Appellants/Petitioners also can raise the question that the procedure which is expected to be followed had not been followed by the respondents while issuing the impugned proceedings.
4. The learned single Judge should not appreciated that several important contentions raised by the Appellants/Petitioners. In fact a suit was already filed relating to the declaration of title and the same is pending but however it is pertinent to note that the validity of the proceedings cannot be gone into in the said suit and hence in the said circumstances the Appellants/Petitioners had filed the present writ petition questioning the said impugned proceedings.
5. The learned single Judge should have appreciated that when the proceedings are nonest and totally without jurisdiction they are liable to be quashed at the instance of the aggrieved parties i.e., the Appellants who are the absolute owners of the said property. At any rate the learned single Judge had not appreciated of the said property. At any rate the learned single Judge had not appreciated the difference provisions of the ……………. Wakf Act properly in this regard.
6. And all other grounds which will be urged at the time of making the final submissions.
A fixed Court fee of Rs…………… is paid herewith.
Place :………….
Date :…………..
Advocate for Appellants.
Barelaw, an online platform dedicated to delivering comprehensive legal knowledge, proudly presents its exclusive category of case briefs. This section is meticulously crafted to offer insightful analyses of landmark judgments, providing a valuable resource for legal professionals, students, and anyone interested in understanding the intricacies of law. Our case briefs delve deep into pivotal court decisions, exploring the rationale behind each judgment and its impact on the legal landscape.
We understand that navigating the complexities of legal judgments can be challenging. That’s why our case briefs are designed to be both informative and accessible, ensuring that readers gain a clear understanding of the key legal principles involved. Each brief includes a summary of the facts, the legal issue at hand, the court’s reasoning, and the ultimate decision. This structured approach makes it easier for our audience to grasp the nuances of each case.
Our website is a treasure trove of legal wisdom, constantly updated with the latest and most significant cases. Whether you’re a law student seeking to enhance your knowledge, a practicing attorney looking for a quick reference, or simply a curious mind eager to understand the law’s evolution, Barelaw is your go-to destination
Explore our case briefs and immerse yourself in the world of law. Visit our website now and discover the wealth of legal knowledge at your fingertips. The link is provided below for your convenience and direct access to our expansive legal database
You can access more legal drafts here – https://www.barelaw.in/legal-drafts/
