
Defamation in attacking someone’s reputation by written or oral communication copper falls and unprivileged statement. Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code deals with defamation. According to IPC, defamation is an act of injuring someone’s reputation by any means- written or spoken, published or anything that may be observed through the eyes of an ordinary man. Written defamation is also called libel and spoken defamation may also be known as slander. Defamation has been made an offence without any reference to its tendency to cause acts of illegal violence. Mental suffering caused to the person defamed is the gist of this offence. In English law, a distinction has been maintained between libel and slander, but under Indian law of such distinction has been made.
Definition as a crime in IPC-
Although freedom of speech and expression has been granted by article 19 of the constitution there are certain exemptions under article 19(1). These are- contempt of court, provocation of an offence and defamation. Under a criminal suit, the intention to defame is an important and necessary factor. It has to be proved that the act of information was done to injure the reputation of another. Article 21 guarantees the right to life which means that it shall also include the right to reputation of a person. Defamation against a deceased person- In the cases of defamation against a deceased person it is assumed that would such imputation harm the reputation of that had he been alive.
Essential ingredients-
Who are exempted from punishments for making defamation statements?
There are certain exceptions provided in Section 499 of IPC. They are-
Punishment- Punishment for defamation is provided under section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. It punishes the offender of defamation with simple imprisonment extending up to 2 years, or with a fine, or both.
Defences available against defamation-
(1) justification by truth- if the statement made is authentic, the truth becomes an absolute defence. The burden of proof lies on the defendant.
(2) Fair and Bonafide comment- If a comment is made in the matter of public interest, without any malicious intention, it shall be protected. Public officers, actors, authors and athletes are subject to such comments. If malice is proved, no defence lies.
(3) Fair justification pleaded- where a plea is made in respect of matters of opinion, the defendant has to only prove that the opinion expressed by him was honest and accurate.
(4) absolute privilege- this gives a person an absolute immunity arising out of a defamation lawsuit, even if the statement is defamatory. Absolute privilege is granted to
(5) qualified privilege- the defence of qualified privilege is allowed when the person has the moral and legal duty to do so and the listener has an interest in it. This privilege can be availed of in a reference to a job interview
(7) statement of opinion- if the statement is not a fact but a mere opinion made by a person or a group of people, it cannot be considered defamatory unless it seriously affects someone adversely.
(8) Consent- if the plaintiff consents to the statement made, voluntary and with a sound mind, there is no defamation.
(9) censure passed- If any person passes censure arising out of a valid contract, over the conduct of another person, it shall not amount to defamation.