Criminal Complaint u/ss 323, 324, 504 & 506 r/w sec 34 of the Indian penal code

alt="Criminal Complaint u/ss 323, 324, 504 & 506 r/w sec 34 of the Indian penal code"

Criminal Complaint u/ss 323, 324, 504 & 506 r/w sec 34 of the Indian penal code

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS, (COURT NO. 2),
MUMBAI AT MUMBAI
Criminal Complaint No. Shri _ D M _ K , )
age 35 years, occupation – service, ) Complainant
resident of 1000 ……………., )
MUMBAI 400 011. )
Versus
Shri _ B _ J P , ) age 56 years, occupation – business, ) Shri S _ B _ P __, ) Accused
age 25 years, occupation – business, )
both residents of 1050 ……….., )
MUMBAI 400001. )

A COMPLAINT U/SS 323, 324, 504 & 506 R/W SEC. 34 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE
The complainant above-named submits this complaint, praying to state as follows:

  1. That the complainant is a resident of the within mentioned address, and the said
    house property is owned by the accused No. 1 and let out to this complainant as a
    monthly tenant.
  2. That the complainant is a Government servant, peace-lover and law- abiding citizen.
  3. That in the month of 2010 the accused No. 1 called upon this complainant to
    vacate the said premises within a week or so.
    4.That since this complainant did not vacate the said premises, the accused No. 1 then again
    on….., the son of the accused No. 1, i.e. the accused No. 2, came to the complainant and
    threatened him of the dire consequences, if the complainant, if the complainant were to fail or
    avoid to vacate the said premises before the end of….2010…..
  4. That the complainant submits that he did not vacate the said premises, and he was
    not legally bound to do so.
  5. That then, on….., at 6.30 p.m., when this complainant had been returning from his office to his
    residence, while he was entering the said premises, both the accused accosted the
    complainant and started abusing him in a dirty and filthy language, and even though the
    complainant tried to convince and tell them that what they were doing was all illegal, both the
    accused attacked the complainant and gave him a number of blows with fists and lastly the
    accused No. 2 gave a severe blow with a cudgel/staff/ stick in his hand on the forehead of this
    complainant and thereby caused a serious injury to the complainant, and the complainant had also
    become unconscious.
  6. That when the people staying in the neighbourhood gathered there, the accused stopped
    beating and they both went away, announcing and pronouncing a threat that if the
    Complainant were to fail to vacate the said premises within a couple of days, he would be killed,
    and hence, this complaint.
  7. That the cause of action for this complaint first arose on……and the same has since then
    been every day thereafter, and hence, this complaint filed today is well within limitation.
  8. That the offence has been committed within the local limits of the jurisdiction of this Court, and
    hence, this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to try and decide this complaint.
  9. That the necessary court-fee is paid herewith.
  10. That the complainant, therefore, prays that the accused be kindly charged with and tried for
    the offence punishable u/ss 323, 324, 504 and 506 R/W Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal
    Code and punished according to law.
    MUMBAI, Sd/- DMK
    COMPLAINANT
    Dated:.
    Sd/- x X x ADVOCATE FOR COMPLAINANT
    VERIFICATION

I, Shri DMK, the present complainant, do hereby state on solemn affirmation
that the contents of this complaint in paras 1 to 11 are true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief, and so I have signed hereunder.
Sd/- DMK COMPLAINANT