The Supreme Court cautioned the Enforcement Directorate not to overstep its statutory boundaries or dictate how state police agencies handle shared information.
The Supreme Court is set to hear a massive batch of petitions covering police action during Delhi protests, lawyer and journalist detentions, Section 172 of BNSS, and ECI voter roll revisions.
A recent legal study reveals how some Supreme Court references waited over two decades for a hearing, exposing major gaps in institutional tracking and the master of the roster system.
Transparency activists have moved the Supreme Court against the ECI's Delhi SIR rule forcing deleted voters to file Form 6, creating a legal dilemma.
The Lawyers' Association for Constitution has approached the Supreme Court under Article 32, alleging severe police excesses, unlawful detention, and denial of legal aid during peaceful protests in Delhi.
Rajya Sabha MP AA Rahim has moved the Supreme Court alleging unlawful custody and physical brutality against DYFI members inside compartmentalised police vans in Delhi.
Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas has written to the Chief Justice of India seeking judicial intervention after being allegedly manhandled and assaulted by the Delhi Police and CRPF during a protest.
The Supreme Court found a prima facie case of contempt of court against top officials for restricting Delhi Metro services during public demonstrations.
The Supreme Court convened a rare Sunday session to address petitions challenging massive preventive detentions, internet shutdowns, and transport curbs during recent political protests in Delhi.
A special two-judge bench of the Supreme Court has convened on Sunday morning to hear urgent petitions challenging Delhi metro closures and the detention of political leaders.
The Supreme Court sets up a rare Sunday hearing to examine Delhi Police detentions of political leaders and alleged metro shutdown contempt.