Introduction Grant v. Australian Knitting Mills (1936) is a famous legal case in commonwealth tort law of carelessness as applied to the production and marketing of consumer goods. It highlights that manufacturers owe consumers certain obligations and forms the basis for some
Faqir Chand Gulati v Uppal Agencies Private Ltd (2008) 10 SCC 345 Case Name Faqir Chand Gulati v Uppal Agencies Private Ltd. Citation (2008) 10 SCC 345 Court Supreme Court of India Judges B.N. Agrawal and G.S. Singhvi Decided On August 29,
Melepurath Sankunni Ezhuthassan v Thekittil Geopalankutty Nair (1986) 1 SCC 118 Case name Melepurath Sankunni Ezhuthassan v. Thekittil Geopalankutty Nair Year of Judgement 1986 Case Type Civil appeal Court Supreme Court of India Brief gist: The case deals with the interpretation of
Rustom K Karanjia v KMD Thackersey, AIR 1970 Bom. 424 In the case of Rustom K. Karanjia v. K. M. D. Thackersey, the plaintiff Rustom K. Karanjia was the editor of a weekly magazine called “Blitz” which was known for its investigative
Tushar Kanti Ghosh v Bina Bhowmick (1953) 57 CWN 378 In Tushar Kanti Ghosh v. Bina Bhowmick (1953) 57 CWN 378, the plaintiff, Tushar Kanti Ghosh, filed a suit for a declaration that a certain deed of gift executed by his father
Case name: Chairman, Railway Board v. Chandrima DasCitation: (2002) 2 SCC 465Court: Supreme Court of IndiaDate of decision: January 31, 2002Parties:Appellant: Chairman, Railway BoardRespondent: Chandrima Das Background: Chandrima Das was working as a senior section officer in the office of the Chairman,
Case Name: N Nagendra Rao & Co v State of APCitation: AIR 1994 SC 2663Court: Supreme Court of IndiaJudges: Kuldip Singh, Faizan Uddin, and B.P. Jeevan ReddyDate of Decision: 10th May 1994 Brief Facts: N. Nagendra Rao & Co. (“the appellant”) was
Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain v State of UP (1965) 1 SCR 375 Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of U. P. is a landmark case in Indian contract law, which dealt with the concept of “unconscionable contracts”. The case was decided by
State of Rajasthan v Vidhyawati (1962) Supp 2 SCR 989 Facts: In this case, Vidhyawati, a widow, was a resident of Rajasthan and was working as a teacher in a government-aided school. Her husband, who was also a teacher in the same
Case Brief of Madras Railway Co v The Zemindar of Carvatenagarum The Madras Railway Co. v. The Zemindar of Carvatenagarum is a case that was heard by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in 1873. The case involved a dispute between
MP Electricity Board v Shail Kumar, AIR 2002 SC 551, is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of India under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The case deals with the liability of the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board for the electrocution