Computation of Detention Period under Section 167 of CrPC Computation of Detention Period under Section 167 of CrPC The case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Rustum has brought to the forefront a crucial aspect of criminal jurisprudence in India – the
Deo Narain v. State of U.P. Deo Narain v. State of U.P. Date of Decision: December 11, 1972Facts: Deo Narain v. State of U.P. (1973) 1 SCC 347: AIR 1973 SC 473 is acase related to the right of private defence. The
State of U.P. v. Ram Swarup State of U.P. v. Ram Swarup Date of Decision: May 2, 1974Facts: On the morning of June 7, 1970, in the sabzi-mandi at Badaun, UttarPradesh, Ram Swarup and Ganga Ram went to Sahib Datta’s house with
S.N. Hussain v. State of Andhra Pradesh S.N. Hussain v. State of Andhra Pradesh Date of Decision: January 5, 1972Facts: The appellant, S.N. Hussain, was a bus driver who was charged withbeing rash or negligent in crossing the railway track when a
Cherubin Gregory v. State of Bihar Cherubin Gregory v. State of Bihar Date of Decision: July 31, 1963Facts: The case involved a negligent act by the accused, which is covered inSection 304A IPC. The accused had fired a gun in the air
Ghapoo Yadav v. State of M.P Ghapoo Yadav v. State of M.P Date of Decision: February 17, 2003Facts: The case involved a dispute over land belonging to accused MangalSingh, which was in the possession of Ramlal. Over the land, a berry treeexisted.
KM Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra KM Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra Date of Decision: November 24, 1961 Facts: The case involved a naval officer, Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati, who was tried for the murder of his wife’s lover, Prem Ahuja. The incident
Gyarsibai v. The State, AIR 1953 M.B. Gyarsibai v. The State, AIR 1953 M.B. Facts: The appellant, Gyarsibai, lived with her husband, children, and sister-in- law Kaiserbai in the same house. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, along with her children, husband
Jurisdiction: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction: Bombay High CourtCase Filed (in years): 1876Case Decided (in years): 1877Judges: Justice Melvill, Justice Kemball, N HaridasCase Brief Prepared by: M Balaji Case Brief: Reg v. Govinda (1877) ILR Bom 342 Introduction: One of the most important concepts
CASE NAME- K. M. NANAVATI V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRACITATIONS- [CITATION: 1962 AIR 605]COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIABENCH: SUBBARAO, K.DAS, S.K. DAYAL, RAGHUBARAPPELLANT: K.M. NANAVATIRESPONDENT: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA CASE SUMMARY STATEMENT OF FACTS Kevas Manekshaw Nanavati was an Indian Naval Officer who shifted
PRIMARY DETAILS OF THE CASE: Case No Jurisdiction Case Filed (in years) Case Decided on Judges : : : : : Criminal Appeal No. 90 of 1957. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Supreme Court of India 1957 March 11, 1958 Justice Bose Introduction: It