The Calcutta High Court recently ruled that a deceased government employee's family pension must be split equally between his two wives, while his gratuity belongs solely to his registered nominee.
Case- Case Brief of MC Mehta and Another v. Union of India and othersCitation- 1987 SCR (1) 819 Introduction: The Indian subcontinent has its unique environmental resources, and it is known for its climate conditions. These resources are in their vulnerable stage
Case brief on Shreya Singhal v. Union of India SCC Online SC 248 Introduction: With the advent of technology, there come a lot of issues and challenges that accompany the same. It is important that the laws are not static in it,
Case Brief on Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra Writ petition (civil) 509 of 1997 Primary details of the case: Introduction: Is there any court of law or procedure to overturn or to find the remedy even after the petitioner who wants
Jurisdiction: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction: Bombay High CourtCase Filed (in years): 1876Case Decided (in years): 1877Judges: Justice Melvill, Justice Kemball, N HaridasCase Brief Prepared by: M Balaji Case Brief: Reg v. Govinda (1877) ILR Bom 342 Introduction: One of the most important concepts
CASE NAME- K. M. NANAVATI V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRACITATIONS- [CITATION: 1962 AIR 605]COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIABENCH: SUBBARAO, K.DAS, S.K. DAYAL, RAGHUBARAPPELLANT: K.M. NANAVATIRESPONDENT: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA CASE SUMMARY STATEMENT OF FACTS Kevas Manekshaw Nanavati was an Indian Naval Officer who shifted
Case Name- I.R. Coelho v State of Tamil NaduCitations- [(2007) 2 SCC 1: AIR 2007 SC 861.] FACTS OF THE CASE After the Constitution was instituted, a few agrarian and land reforms legislation were passed. These were tested in State High Courts
Justice K.S.Puttaswamy (Retired). V. Union of India and Ors, 2017. Citation: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012, (2017) 10 SCC 1 Court: Supreme Court of India Parties Involved: Appellant: Justice K S Puttaswamy (Retired)Respondent: Union of India and Others. Bench: Sanjay
PRIMARY DETAILS OF THE CASE: Case No Jurisdiction Case Filed (in years) Case Decided on Judges : : : : : Criminal Appeal No. 90 of 1957. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Supreme Court of India 1957 March 11, 1958 Justice Bose Introduction: It
CITATION- (1410) Y.B. 11 hen. IV of 47. Introduction The case revolves around the principle of injuria sine damnum and damnum sine injuria. Both the concepts state different theories and reasoning. The case is necessary for the law of torts as it
Case Name- Town Area Committee and Ors. vs Prabhu Dayal and Anr.Citations- AIR 1975 All 132 Introduction- the case mainly revolves around the U.P. Municipal Act and the maxim “damnum sine injuria”. The case is in relation to the construction and demolition