Bare Law is an educational platform for Students to develop their knowledge by the way of writing and reading. The Platform is open all to students and working professionals in the field of Law. The Law Life Team aims to provide the platform for legal connectivity and knowledge., we will update on the Legal News and opportunities in the field of Law.
Jagdish Ram vs State Of Rajasthan The Indian judiciary witnessed a remarkable case that underscores the enduring battle against the practice of untouchability, a social evil abolished by the Constitution of India decades ago. The case of Jagdish Ram vs State Of
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 96 C. P. C. IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE………………..Civil Appeal No………………… of 19………………..u/s. 96 C. P. C. C. D…………………………………………… Plaintiff/Appellant versus C. F……………………………………… Defendant/Respondent Sir,The appeal of the Plaintiff/appellant against judgment and decree of the learned Civil
Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision to reserve judgment on the appeal by the makers of the popular web series ‘College Romance’ has stirred up discussions on creative freedom, censorship, and the portrayal of obscenity in digital media. The web series, known for
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 115 C. P. C. — REVISION IN DISTRICT COURT IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE………………..Civil Rev. No………………… of 19………………………..U/s. 115 C. P. C.A. B………………………………………….. Plaintiff/ApplicantversusCD…………………………………….. Defendant/RespondentValuation of suit property: Rs…………………Nature of Suit: Suit for injunctionCourt fee paid on
Anticipatory Bail: Insights from Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia vs State of Punjab ‘Anticipatory Bail’ is an enchanting term that materializes in the convoluted corridors of the Indian legal system reassuring those who dread being arrested unfairly. In India, the crucial case of Gurbaksh
Donald Trump’s Legal Quagmire: A Comprehensive Guide to the Ongoing Litigations” Former President Donald Trump is entangled in a myriad of legal battles that span across various jurisdictions, ranging from accusations of fraud and defamation to serious charges of election subversion. With
Rasiklal v. Kishore Khanchand Wadhwani High Court hearing Rasiklal v. Kishore Khanchand Wadhwani overruled a previous judgment delivered by JMFC, Indore, on 01.07.2015 in Criminal Case No.16047/2006 made the news headlines on July 2. The case involves defamation allegations against petitioner Rasiklal
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 95 CPC IN THE COURT OF………………..Suit No………………….. 200In the Matter of: –AB…………………………………………………………… plaintiffversusCD……………………………………………………….. DefendantMost Respectfully Showeth: –
Delhi High Court Halts FranchiseByte’s Misuse of ‘WOW! MOMO’ Trademark In a recent verdict, the Delhi High Court has issued a restraining order against FranchiseByte, barring the unauthorized use of the trademark ‘WOW! MOMO’. The order was passed on October 20 by
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 46 CPC IN THE COURT OF……………………………Suit No………………….. 199……………In the Matter of:AB…………………………………………………………… PlaintiffversusCD……………………………………………………….. DefendantMost Respectively Showeth: –