Bare Law is an educational platform for Students to develop their knowledge by the way of writing and reading. The Platform is open all to students and working professionals in the field of Law. The Law Life Team aims to provide the platform for legal connectivity and knowledge., we will update on the Legal News and opportunities in the field of Law.
FORM NO. 44-A BOND FOR APPEARANCE OF OFFENDER RELEASED PENDING REALISATION OF FINE [See Section 424 (1) (b) Whereas I, …………………..(name), inhabitant of…………………….. (place), have been sentenced topay a fine of rupees…………….. and in default of payment thereof to undergo imprisonmentfor……………………..and whereas
Tushar Kanti Ghosh v Bina Bhowmick (1953) 57 CWN 378 In Tushar Kanti Ghosh v. Bina Bhowmick (1953) 57 CWN 378, the plaintiff, Tushar Kanti Ghosh, filed a suit for a declaration that a certain deed of gift executed by his father
FORM NO. 28 BOND AND BAIL-BOND ON A PRELIMINARY INQUIRY BEFORE A POLICE OFFICER (See Section 169) I, (name), of………………….being charged with the offence of……..and after inquiry required toappear before the Magistrate of ………………. Or …..and after inquiry called upon to enter
Case name: Chairman, Railway Board v. Chandrima DasCitation: (2002) 2 SCC 465Court: Supreme Court of IndiaDate of decision: January 31, 2002Parties:Appellant: Chairman, Railway BoardRespondent: Chandrima Das Background: Chandrima Das was working as a senior section officer in the office of the Chairman,
The Personal Data Protection Bill in India: Implications for Individual Privacy and Businesses The Personal Data Protection Bill (PDPB), currently under consideration in India, represents a major shift in the way data privacy is conceptualized and regulated in the country. It aims
BOND AND BAIL-BOND FOR ATTENDANCE BEFORE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF POLICE STATION OR COURT FORM NO. 45 BOND AND BAIL-BOND FOR ATTENDANCE BEFORE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF POLICE STATION OR COURT [See Sections 436, 436-A, 437, 437-A, 438 (3) and 441] I,
Case Name: N Nagendra Rao & Co v State of APCitation: AIR 1994 SC 2663Court: Supreme Court of IndiaJudges: Kuldip Singh, Faizan Uddin, and B.P. Jeevan ReddyDate of Decision: 10th May 1994 Brief Facts: N. Nagendra Rao & Co. (“the appellant”) was
BOND AND BAIL-BOND AFTER ARREST UNDER A WARRANT I, (name), of……………………………, being brought before the District Magistrate of…………………….(or as the case may be) under a warrantissued to compel my appearance to answer to the charge of………………………….., do hereby bind myself to attend
Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain v State of UP (1965) 1 SCR 375 Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of U. P. is a landmark case in Indian contract law, which dealt with the concept of “unconscionable contracts”. The case was decided by
An Eye-Opening Bail Petition : A Lawyer’s Toolkit In the Court of the Sub-Divisional JudicialMagistrate at…………………The State …………………APPLICANT…………………………versusAB, CD, EF & GH……..RESPONDENTCase under section 188, IPC; section 116, Cr PC; section 29, Police Act; section 151, Cr PCThe humble petition of the