Bare Law is an educational platform for Students to develop their knowledge by the way of writing and reading. The Platform is open all to students and working professionals in the field of Law. The Law Life Team aims to provide the platform for legal connectivity and knowledge., we will update on the Legal News and opportunities in the field of Law.
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT AGAINST A SURETY Draft WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT AGAINST A SURETY (See Section 446) To,……………….of………………….Whereas (name, description and address) has bound himself as surety for the appearance of(mention the condition of the bond) and the said (name) has made default,
Kishan v. State of M.P. Kishan v. State of M.P. Date of Decision: November 19, 1997Facts: The case is related to the act of self-defence and murder. The casediscusses the distinction between the act of self-defence and murder, and thepunishment for the
WARRANT OF ARREST Draft WARRANT OF ARREST (See Section 70) To,(name and designation of the person or persons who is or are to execute the warrant).Whereas (name of accused) of (address) stands charged with the offence of (state the offence), youare hereby
Deo Narain v. State of U.P. Deo Narain v. State of U.P. Date of Decision: December 11, 1972Facts: Deo Narain v. State of U.P. (1973) 1 SCC 347: AIR 1973 SC 473 is acase related to the right of private defence. The
WARRANT IN THE FIRST INSTANCE TO BRING UP A WITNESS Draft WARRANT IN THE FIRST INSTANCE TO BRING UP A WITNESS (See Section 87) To,(name and designation of the police officer or other person or persons who is or are to executethe
State of U.P. v. Ram Swarup State of U.P. v. Ram Swarup Date of Decision: May 2, 1974Facts: On the morning of June 7, 1970, in the sabzi-mandi at Badaun, UttarPradesh, Ram Swarup and Ganga Ram went to Sahib Datta’s house with
WARRANT FOR RECOVERY OF FINE Draft (See Section 421) To,The Collector of the district of,……………….Whereas (name, address and description of the offender) was on the……………. day of……………………….20…………….. convicted before me of the offence of (mention the offenceconcisely), and sentenced to pay a
S.N. Hussain v. State of Andhra Pradesh S.N. Hussain v. State of Andhra Pradesh Date of Decision: January 5, 1972Facts: The appellant, S.N. Hussain, was a bus driver who was charged withbeing rash or negligent in crossing the railway track when a
WARRANT AFTER A COMMUTATION OF A SENTENCE Draft WARRANT AFTER A COMMUTATION OF A SENTENCE (See Sections 386, 413 and 416) To,The Officer in charge of the Jail at……………………Whereas at a Session held on the………………….. day of……………………..20………………….. (nameof prisoner), the (1st,2nd, 3rd,
Cherubin Gregory v. State of Bihar Cherubin Gregory v. State of Bihar Date of Decision: July 31, 1963Facts: The case involved a negligent act by the accused, which is covered inSection 304A IPC. The accused had fired a gun in the air